Monday, November 5, 2007

Basketball Trades: Hey Kobe, Watch What You Say

This past week as I explored the blogosphere to explore the recent events of the National Basketball Association (NBA), I could not help but comment on blogs covering the Kobe Bryant trade. Both posts I chose to respond to highlight the marketing effects of Kobe Bryant playing for another team. For those who are unfamiliar, Kobe Bryant (pictured to the right) has been a member of the Los Angeles Lakers for the past eleven years. During those years, he has earned many prestigious awards such as Most Valuable Player, All NBA Team, All Defensive Team, and most importantly, he is a three time champion. Although Bryant has made history with the Lakers, it has not always been the fairy tale story. He has had serious problems with the franchise, and now he has come out to the public to express how he wants to leave Los Angles and be traded to another team. The first of the two posts I chose to comment on comes from FoxSports.com columnist Charley Rosen. Rosen is an accredited source because he is a former basketball player and coach, and he has been an NBA columnist for many years and has written thirteen books about basketball with hi current one being "The pivotal season — How the 1971-72 L.A. Lakers changed the NBA." His post "Still Some Possibilities in Kobe Derby" discusses the possible trades for Bryant and the likeliness of it occurring. Similarly, the second post I chose “Kobe Bryant: the Update” is written by True Hoop senior writer, Henry Abbott. Abbott is well known for his numerous articles in sports magazines including HOOP, Inside Stuff, Men's Journal, and the official NBA Finals program. This post covers how the actual situation details about the Kobe Bryant trade are very unclear. Even though both posts focus on different aspects of the Bryant trade, they both are equally important in understanding the changes of Kobe Bryant’s positioning in the league. I would like to point out that my responses to these posts are located below for convenience.


"Still Some Possibilities in Kobe Derby"
Comment:
As a Los Angeles native and follower of the Lakers since the start of Kobe Bryant’s career, I would like to start off and say you write a very interesting and analytical blog. I do, however, have some questions for you pertaining to this post. From a marketing perspective, when you write about Bryant going to Philadelphia for Andre Iguodala and Andre Miller and how “the fan attraction of Kobe's coming home would have a huge impact on their attendance — and the 76ers' future would look brighter than ever,” do you really think that this would have a positive impact considering Bryant’s inconsiderate statements about he cannot win a championship with his team. Do you think more Philadelphia fans would come out and watch him play? Even though Bryant is originally from Philadelphia, I believe his controversial comments have marred his positioning in the sports franchise because he no longer presents himself as a team leader, but rather he seems very controlling and inflexible. The image of the sports franchise surrounds the phrase “I love this game” for various reasons and one of the most common reasons is the team atmosphere. In my opinion, Kobe Bryant’s statements are not living up to this expectation, and I feel that he has hurt his credibility of being a well rounded aspiring basketball player. Although you do not think he will be traded to Philadelphia, but if he were, I do not think that more Philadelphia fans would come out and watch him play from a marketing perspective.

Kobe Bryant: the Update
Comment:

I would like to start off by saying I admire all the various sources you bring into your post. It is very interesting to see all the different reports surrounding the Kobe Bryant trade situation. With that said, I do have question about one of your claims. In your post, you write that with all these vague stories “What does all that mean? I really have no idea, at this point, what to make of it. What I do know, is that this does not seem to be a media misinterpretation of status quo.” I would have to disagree with you because from a marketing perspective, the media is a major source for news. The way people think is based greatly on what the media reports. I believe the media has misinterpreted the current situation of the Kobe Bryant trade because as you have reported, there are many different stories which leaves fans confused about what is true and what is false. As well, the media makes assumptions and drives them out of proportion at times. When Kobe sits out for practice or takes home his belongings from his locker, the media quickly reports that he is leaving, but they do not know for sure. In my opinion, the media should simply wait for Bryant or the Lakers franchise to make a public statement before making any reports. Consequently, with all the various stories about Bryant’s trade, his positioning, the way fans view him, is getting destroyed and it is a shame for an all star athlete to lose his credibility due to the misinterpretation of the media.

Monday, October 29, 2007

Government Laws: Keep Yousif in Britain or He Will Die

Imagine living in a country of political turmoil in which all you can plan for is to see another day. This was the situation for 400 meter runner Rabah Yousif from Darfur, Sudan. To escape this persecution, he moved to England at the age of 18 where he was granted an asylum. Since he has left, 200,000 people in Darfur have died. While in Britain, he started a stable life competing for Britain and starting his own family. Without the fear of worrying about death, Yousif’s accomplishments include two championships and the only British athletes to have run quicker over one lap this year are Tim Benjamin, Martyn Rooney and Andrew Steele. With the 2008 Olympics (to the right) quickly approaching in Beijing, Yousif is a top contender for the gold medal for Britain. However, Yousif faces the biggest roadblock in his life. In recent news, it has been reported that Yousif will be deported back to his birth country, Sudan, after losing his appeal to extend his asylum. I believe this will be a major mistake not only for England and Sudan but also the sports industry. If Yousif goes back to Sudan, his life will be in danger. There is a major chance he might not live to compete ever in his life. As for England, the country loses one of their best competitors. Lastly, the sports industry loses world history. Therefore, from a sports marketing perspective, Yousif needs to stay in England and compete in the 2008 Olympics for England.

At the age of 15, Yousif’s life was in complete danger in Darfur, Sudan. Living in a war-torn country, people would be dying constantly. Looking to escape the persecution to make a difference with his life, Yousif moved to Britain where he was granted asylum. However, with government laws, the asylum has a specific duration before it expires. Now Yousif’s time is up and he must go back to Sudan. Yousif has pleaded in court to let him stay, but there is little hope because Yousif is not British. The British government knows that Yousif is not a major harm to the society because he is helping make history as a representative, but some laws cannot be broken or excused for certain people and not the rest. Therefore it is a difficult situation to judge.

With all this legal issues surrounding Yousif, he is unable to compete to his maximal level. While track requires physical ability and speed, there are also mental issues to balance. Yousif cannot help to be distracted with the facts that he has to leave his wife and son (pictured above) as well as returning to Sudan where his life is on the line. As a result, his career may be lost in a legal battle,” says Katie Legg, Yousif’s sister in law. In order for athletes to focus on the elite level, they have to focus on winning only- nothing else can come in the way because that uses up more energy. This is what marketing companies look for- they want athletes that can compete at a consistent level in which they improve every single time. Yousif has the talent to be one of the best runners for the 400 meter race but it is very difficult to perform well when his future is unknown. Therefore the government cannot get in the way of destroying his dream.

I believe that Yousif (to the right) needs to stay in Britain. The government of Sudan cannot force him to go back home because his life will come to an end because he will have to leave his wife and child and he will not know if he will be alive. It is important to note that Yousif has the capability to compete in high-caliber races which gives him the positioning for marketing his talent. In doing so, he has the ability to make history and this is what the sports industry needs. From a marketing perspective, Yousif stands out because he has a unique past history with sheer talent and therefore he stands out. These are the characteristics companies look to market because it reveals qualities that fans can aspire to and use to motivate them to do the same. If an athlete has the ability to make a difference in the sports industry, then he should have the right to compete regardless.

Monday, October 22, 2007

Sports Branding: Reebok India is the New Way of Life

Go big or go home. This is the theme that Reebok India has weaved throughout the twelve years that it has existed. Currently, there are 525 Reebok stores in different parts of the country, but the goal is for 1000 by the end of 2009. Not only is Reebok creating its corporate image through retail stores, it sponsors over forty elite players in addition to providing athletic programs (to the left) to the buyers. But that is not all. In recent news, Reebok has announced that it wants to sponsor players from the grass root level and make the merchandise available to individuals living in suburban or rural neighborhoods. By doing so, Reebok is expanding its target cohort. This will modify the entertainment image of sports and create a new way of life. Based on the evidence, I believe that Reebok’s strategic marketing plan will create a unique brand for the company that will result in major profits not only in the short run but also the long run.


Reebok in the beginning started off as a small company in India, but has slowly evolved into one of the dominant market entities in India. With a corporate image of sports merchandise, it positioned itself toward the target audience of athletic males, but as time went on, the media expanded this demographic. According to Rediff.com columnist Meenakshi Radhakrishnan-Swami, Reebok’s thought was to "Ask not what percentage of an existing market your brand can achieve. Ask how large a market your brand can create by putting resources behind creating a category." One of the most important skills for valuable marketing is powerful branding. By making a unique name for the company, people will remember it. Once Reebok noticed that women and children were interested in sports, it began to change its positioning by opening a new women’s and children’s collection line to appeal to that audience. With this expansion, Reebok is showing all its competitors that its investments are based on making athletic apparel the new fashion line for everyone.

Given a larger consumer base, Reebok took it another step further to enhance the corporate image of the company. Managing director Subhinder Singh Prem (to the right) explained that the focus for Reebok “is to develop a new genre of sports and fitness enthusiasts making immense sense for a brand that is synonymous to sports and fitness gear.” This is an important point because in order to make a brand stand out it has to be incorporated into a person’s daily routine. Reebok India has done so by training individuals to become fitness instructors. In doing so, individuals are educated about exercise and understand its impact with all the associated health benefits. As a result, Reebok has created a new fitness trend in India.

With the consistent expansion and improvement for Reebok, it announced in recent news that it was looking to sponsor cricket athletes from the grass root level. Prem said that “this program will not be limited to Ranji trophy players but also target cricketing talents in tier III cities who may not grow for lack of resources.” By doing so, Reebok India is exposing itself to an even wider population. The company is awarding those players who have unique talent and deserve attention but may not be able to afford to participate in distinguished sports programs. Therefore, Reebok India is establishing its brand as a inclusive and well rounded company that cares about all athletes. In doing so, the world of sports becomes increasingly exciting and more individuals become interested and find ways to become a part of it whether it is through attending games or buying memorabilia. This leads to higher sales and more exposure for Reebok and the companies it supports.

By having an extensive marketing strategy, I have concluded that Reebok India is an excellent example of branding in the business of sports. The company specifically focuses on consumers by spending $100 million dollars annually on research and development. Even though that money could be spent on sponsoring another athlete or investing in another store, this is a smart move because Reebok knows exactly what consumers think of the products and what they will buy. As well, by including athletes from the grass root level, it shows no bias, but rather is presenting itself as a company that values the talent and effort that is put into sports. With companies creating a variety of different products, Reebok reminds us that the key to differentiation is branding.

Monday, October 8, 2007

Marathon Rivalry: Why Apologize?

Growing up on farm in Ethiopia, Haile Gebrselassie ran ten kilometers to and from school every morning. Now at 34, he runs with a crooked left arm because he was always holding books under it. Recently, Gebrselassie apologized for breaking the Berlin Marathon world record by completing it in 2:04.26 (pictured to the right) which is 29 seconds faster than the previous world record holder and close friend, Kenyan Paul Terget. After completing the race, Gebrselassie could only tell reporters "Don't ask me how I am. It's very special, spectacular." Obviously, Gebrselassie’s accomplishment is admirable because his time in simple terms translates into 4 minutes 45 seconds every mile in comparison to an average person who runs approximately 8 minute miles. But there is more to this story than sheer talent. This sport has unveiled a rivalry between neighboring East African countries, Ethiopia and Kenya, which together hold many running records. Each nation has a completely different training program, but they both share the common goal of performing at the elite level. So with much competition, why would Gebrselassie publicly apologize for beating Terget’s time? I believe that he could be trying to send the message that although each runner has their own personalized way of preparing for races, marathon running is indirectly a team sport because they must work together to complete all 26.2 miles.

To put this issue into perspective, it should be noted that living in a developing country could seem devastating, but some of the world’s greatest come from those locales. Athletics are taken very seriously because when players perform at the top level, then the media is able to focus on something that the people are proud of, even if it is temporarily. Kenya and Ethiopia have two distinct forms of accomplishing this task. Kenya has a free central system in which each player performs for himself. According to Kipchoge Keino, winner of Kenya’s Olympic golds in 1968 and 1972, "Kenyans go where the money is and they're allowed to go where the money is.” When marathoners win races, they earn large monetary prizes such as $500,000, which makes a huge difference in the life of a Kenyan. However, running 26.2 miles takes a great amount of energy, and thus it is difficult to compete constantly without allowing the body to completely recover. Racing is more about quality than quantity, and if the Kenyan team wants to continue performing at the elite level in the future, then they must be particular in which races they choose to compete.

In contrast to the Kenyan’s free approach, the Ethiopian system is structured under the control of Woldemeskel Kostre (pictured to the left), who ran track and studied sports pedagogy in communist Hungary. He understands the commitment and discipline required to achieve victory, and thus he runs his program with low tolerance. For example, before the Olympics in Sydney, Gebrselassie asked if he could treat a nagging injury, meaning he would arrive late and Kostre replied, "If you don't come with us, then I can't put you in the team. So he decided to come with us and he won.” Under Kostre’s training program, this sport calls for complete discipline, trust, and communication. If these three are in harmony, athletes have the ability to accomplish the impossible. I believe that Kostre’s philosophy seems harsh and difficult to sustain, but that is only in the short run. This ideaolgy will have a bigger impact in the long run because he focuses on quality training, performance, and most importantly faith that these athletes have the capabilities to make world history. As a result, this is a strong positioning strategy because these elite athletes compete only in certain races and set records so they are branded as one of the world’s toughest competition.

Similar to accomplishing the impossible, I understand that running marathons is not that simple. Having previous experience in running the Los Angeles Marathon, I am aware of the physical and mental endurance needed to complete the race. Gebrselassie, therefore, has positioned himself apart from the elite runners because especially today, athletes are consistently breaking records, but to break a world marathon record is not very common. As well, when he said after ten minutes of finishing the race that he "really wanted to do this record but […] was a little bit worried about it, worried about attacking my friend's record," I believe he was being sincere because running may seem to be an individual sport, but there is more to it than just running. Marathons require more mental toughness than physical ability because of the longevity. The training requires much commitment so creating friendships with other runners is ideal because they understand the joy and pain.

Despite the depth and appeal of these genuine friendships, the media chooses to exaggerate the rivalry between the two countries. In reality, there is no rivalry during the race. The race is too long to take an extensive lead the entire way so runners must work together for most of the duration-this is a team sport (as pictured to the right). Thus, the media should try to focus less on making running an individualistic rivalry between two countries, but rather, two winning countries competing together to make world history. Watching athletes who come from impoverished nations set world history are emblems that every individual could aspire to and use as a source of motivation. Thus, the skill and dignity of these athletes make them not only exemplars of their sport but also of humankind, which surely is a marketing and public relations blessing.

Monday, October 1, 2007

International Football: How to Reach Superstar Status

Imagine playing for a football team whose rivals date back to the 19th century. With over eighty thousand fans in attendance (as seen in the picture below) and the media covering every minute move, the pressure is unbearable but highly motivating. This is a brief description of the number one sport in the world, football, which is called soccer in the United States. As the most popular and watched sport, competition is very evident. This has led to verbal and physical encounters not only between players, but within the crowd. The players, coaching staff, and fans treat football not only as a sporting event, but as a part of their life. The country’s reputation is on the line. With this intense pressure, players must perform consistently at such high standards to maintain the support from the franchise, fans, and media. Therefore, players must decide how far they want to push themselves.

In recent news, the New England Arsenal manager, Arsene Wenger, who is pictured below, has been under deep scrutiny for comments concerning trading prospects. The team from a statistical view is currently in first place in the Premiere League winning the last seven games. From a financial status, the Arsenal has enough money to invest into an all star player. Wenger, however, has commented, “I don't see this player at the moment anywhere." This is such a strong statement because he is blatantly stating that the football players are not playing to their potential and do not deserve large paychecks. However, this remark could be used as a reverse psychology tactic. Players now feel they must practice and play harder to earn the recognition they deserve. In doing so, this attention will lead to more media headlines which will give players the opportunity of possible endorsement contracts and higher salaries. The problem with this tactic is it can lead to trouble. Some athletes feel they must find other methods to improve in a short amount of time. This leads to steroid abuse, and when this news is revealed and made public, the reputation of the player as well as the franchise is tarnished. Therefore, players must decide what is more important, the money or the quality of the game.

All star football player, Ronaldinho de Assís Moreira , (as pictured below) is a specific example of a player under a large amount of pressure. He is, at the moment, the epitome of football players. Ronaldinho earns the respect not only from his fans, but also his rivals as seen when he scored two goals against the real Madrid and “the Real Madrid and the Madrid fans saluted Ronaldinho with a standing ovation despite Real Madrid suffering a 3-0 defeat.” However, his injury is hurting his world renowned reputation. With the Arsenal having a large salary capacity to offer Ronaldinho, Wenger has refused to make any offers. He unashamedly said, "Maybe one year ago he was the best player in the world. Is he today? No. It's as simple as that." This statement is very controversial because Ronaldinho’s reputation is highly valued in the game right now. According to consultancy firm BBDO Germany, “Beckham still has the best-known face, but Ronaldinho's age and recent feats make him a better marketing prospect.” Many sports fans come out specifically to watch him play, and as a result of this high attendance, the franchise earns a large amount of money through endorsement deals, ticket sales, and player paraphernalia. Why would the Arsenal not want to bring Ronaldinho to the team? His statistics clearly show that he has the capabilities of making football history not only for himself but for the Arsenal franchise. It would be a win- win situation.

But Wenger makes an important point. All star player status should be given to players who perform at top notch levels on a consistent basis. If the player cannot do this, then a team should not spend a large portion of the budget on them. It is important for teams to invest in quality players that improve their performance every game. By doing so, this leads to a domino effect (as pictured to the right). As a result of the consistent improvement, players increase their confidence which allows the coaching staff to have the flexibility to create various plays. With so much variety every game, more fans come for the unexpected excitement, and then more sponsors become involved because of the positive marketing opportunities. At the end, the reputation of the sport becomes renowned globally. Players, therefore, need to be willing to take on risks to set themselves apart, although the probability of serious injuries rises. However, stepping out of the usual is what creates the excitement of the game and makes the world’s greatest players.

Monday, September 24, 2007

Sports Scandals: The Media Misuses its Power

Today, the role of the media is becoming more controversial. It is covering stories about famous athletes and their legal trouble. The media sends messages that do not set an example for the youth to make a positive difference. This has inspired me to craft a blog that covers my opinion about the media and the image it is creating for the sports industry. I comment on two blogs which can be seen in the following two paragraphs. The first post I comment on is written by commentator, Rajiv Mohan, from The Sentinel, which is a monthly independent publication for Ohio State University. In his recent blog entitled Sports and the American Way: Will we impeach Vick? Mohan focuses on the public’s reaction to Michael Vick’s dog fighting scandal and the reason for their reaction. My second post that I comment on is written by ESPN.com commentator J.A. Adande entitled O.J. and the Knicks, Standing on the Brink, Together Again. He focuses on the O.J. Simpson robbery scandal as well as the controversy arising with the New York Knicks franchise and how the media is profiting from it.


Comment:

I would like to start by saying I found your post to be very interesting. You bring forth a solid argument about how the media covers the latest news and how society interprets it. Also, you bring up two points that I would like to discuss.

First, you write that “frequently, fans are willing to overlook the DUIs, the assaults, and the drugs, so long as the athlete performs and the team wins. Other times, as in Vick's case, exceptional talent and spectacular playmaking are not enough to overcome such intense public disgust.

In my opinion I feel as though when an athlete is convicted of DUI, assault, and drugs, it is the same public disgust as in the Vick case. Athletes are using their popularity to bend the rules of society and as a result they are tarnishing the name of the sport’s franchise as well as their own. However, you point out that fans overlook it. What is the difference? What makes Vick’s case different from any other athlete guilty of a legal offense?
Secondly, do you feel that Vick’s reputation is completely ruined because of him or could you also blame it partly on the media and how they covered the story?


Comment:

Your post brings up an interesting topic of discussion about the role of the media. You use the words “Court Culture,” “the career maker,” “O.J. the job creator” in your post.

Do you feel that the media for the sports franchise is making an athlete’s personal life one of the important priorities to cover now? Also, with the media portraying such negative headlines and making a large amount of money from it, how are young sports fans supposed to take in all this information? Do you think the media should feel some sort of ethical responsibility because they realize that young children look up to these athletes and if they are reading about all the legal offenses, they may be influenced to do the same when they grow older?


I feel that Mohan’s post stirs an important discussion. Vick’s actions are clearly unethical because they portray animal cruelty. There is no benefit in this business. Consequently, the media has created a negative image for Vick in which he has a slim chance of

returning to his reputation as an all star football player. The media has such
a strong power to influence viewers’ perception about athletes in a certain direction. However, I feel that the comment of fans overlooking DUIs, assaults, and drugs is debatable. I feel that athletes at times abuse their fame by breaking the law. I realize that athletes are “normal” individuals, but they should be more cautious of their actions because they are in the public eye. Breaking the law is unacceptable. What I do not understand is why Vick’s reputation has been completely tarnished but other athletes, such as Leonard Little who killed a women, are not being persecuted in the same manner. Unlawful actions are all similar because they do not send a positive message to the public. Therefore, no illegal offense should be overlooked because the sports franchise will no longer be viewed as an industry of elite talent in the future.


As for Adande’s post, I agree with his point that the media makes a fortune from publicizing the athletes’ mistakes. An important point that Adande makes is "that's the irony of Simpson's getting arrested because he's angry about people profiting off his "[stuff]." All he's doing is driving up ratings and creating more money for the real O.J. industry.” The media needs to find the best way to make money, and by covering stories of athletes breaking the law, fans are willing to listen. Money plays a huge factor in the media, and if they have to cover unethical stories to make the money then they will cover the story. The problem I see with the media is the viewers’ hearing and reading the stories. These are not actions that people, especially the youth, should view because it gives them motivation to do the same. Eventually, if there is so much coverage on athletes misbehaving, I believe that the sports industry’s marketability will not be as strong. I think there are two people to blame and that is that athlete for not following the laws and the media for reporting heavily on the misbehavior.

Monday, September 17, 2007

Steroid Abuse: Athletes Use Steroids for Fame and Fortune

In today’s sports news, the hidden truth about steroid abuse is slowly surfacing into various media outputs. Top names of professional athletes are making these headlines which make fans wonder if world records are now being skewed. But why cheat the system? From a business perspective, records prove that once athletes started using steroids to enhance their skills, fame and fortune became evident.


This controversy is becoming evident especially in Major League Baseball. Take for example, Troy Glaus, the third baseman for the Toronto Blue Jays. Glaus began his career with the Anaheim Angeles in 1998, and for the first two years he had a solid and stable career. However, in 2000, he had a breakout season becoming the all time single home run leader for third basemen in Angels’ history and led the entire American League in home runs. For the next three years, Glaus became more popular by earning valuable awards such as being a three time All Star (2000, 2001, and 2003), the Silver Slugger Award two times (2000, 2001), as well as helping the Angels win the World Series for the first time in team history in 2002 and earning the Most Valuable Player Award for that series.


Sadly, the fame slipped away once Glaus suffered a shoulder injury and missed most of the 2004 season. Since it was his last year under contract with the Angels, the team chose not to offer him a contract extension. The Angels decided to invest in a less expensive third baseman and Glaus went on to play for the Arizona Diamondbacks. Unfortunately, Glaus’s fame began to diminish. His statistics showed that he was creating major league lows. His lack of production forced the Diamondbacks to trade him to the Toronto Blue Jays. From a business perspective, companies do not want to sponsor a person that is unproductive and does not have a marketable image. Fans want to follow athletes that improve on a consistent basis. Sadly for Glaus, he went from being one of the greatest third baseman to just becoming a mediocre player.


Society tends to believe that high statistics equals success. Unless an athlete is able to continuously produce solid numbers, fans will stop supporting that athlete and as a result their marketability will drop. For this reason, players feel pressured to resort to the extremes such as using steroids in order to get that “competitive edge” in order to salvage their career. By taking these pills for a certain amount of time, players have the ability to enhance the body in order to make a drastic change in the way they play. With this new change, players have the capabilities to rise to the top and at the same time enhance their marketability.


Along with all the media coverage comes fortune for the players. In the Glaus case, it is important to track his salary change. According to Baseballcube.com, during his first six years, his salary gradually increased each year from $170,000 in 1998 to $7,250,000 in 2003. However, during the year of his injury in 2003, his salary dropped drastically to $725,000. This change called for extreme measures. According to SI.com, Glaus has been reported “[receiving] performance-enhancing drugs from a Florida pharmacy which is under investigation for illegally distributing prescription medications” between September 2003 and May 2004. At that time Glaus went back to becoming an all star caliber baseball player. He was back in the public eye because fans were inspired by his drastic improvement and all the records he was setting. Glaus became a fan favorite once again and was an All Star in 2006. Therefore, it was not a surprise that his salary increased in 2004 when he earned $9,900,000 and is now making $11,500,000. However, the truth about him using steroids was not revealed until four years later.


Consequently, Glaus’s reputation now remains questionable. He refuses to comment on the situation, but the media is confident that he has used steroids because of the evidence accumulated against him. One assumption that has led many to believe that he had to use performance enhancing drugs was his quick recovery from such a serious injury.


Therefore, the Glaus story is just one example of the controversy involving steroid abuse. Sports are becoming much more competitive, and more money and fame are being rewarded to those athletes that have the capabilities to reach the top. With those incentives, players are willing to risk their reputation and take steroids to succeed. If money buys happiness, then athletes are willing to do whatever it takes to get that money. However, when the truth is revealed, not only do they ruin their own reputation, but they also tarnish the team and more importantly Major League Baseball.

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.